Workshop Description
Quantum annealing for combinatorial search across feature selection spaces, promotion bundling configurations, and hyperparameter grids. Covers D-Wave architecture, QUBO formulation, benchmarks against classical solvers, and quantum-inspired alternatives.
Logistics ML pipelines face combinatorial explosions in three recurring areas: selecting predictive features from high-dimensional datasets, optimising promotion bundles across product catalogues, and tuning hyperparameter grids for demand forecasting models. Classical approaches (grid search, random search, Bayesian optimisation) scale poorly as the discrete search space grows. Quantum annealing, specifically D-Wave's Advantage system with 5000+ qubits, offers a fundamentally different approach: encoding these problems as QUBO (Quadratic Unconstrained Binary Optimisation) and exploiting quantum tunnelling to traverse the energy landscape. Published benchmarks show competitive results on certain problem structures, though classical solvers including simulated annealing and Fujitsu Digital Annealer remain strong competitors. Quantum-inspired classical solvers are deployable immediately without hardware access. This workshop works through the formulation process for logistics-specific problems, examines the benchmark evidence honestly, and provides a decision framework for when annealing adds value versus when classical alternatives suffice.
What participants cover
- Classical hyperparameter search limitations: why grid, random, and Bayesian methods hit diminishing returns on high-dimensional logistics ML problems
- Quantum annealing mechanics: transverse-field Ising model, QUBO formulation, minor embedding, and chain strength tuning on D-Wave hardware
- Logistics applications: feature selection, promotion bundling optimisation, and hyperparameter grid search formulated as binary optimisation problems
- Benchmark evidence: D-Wave versus simulated annealing, Gurobi, and quantum-inspired solvers (Fujitsu Digital Annealer, Toshiba SQBM+) on logistics-scale instances
- Problem suitability criteria: which constraint structures and landscape characteristics favour annealing over classical solvers
- Integration patterns: calling annealing solvers from Python ML pipelines, hybrid solver workflows, and immediate-deployment quantum-inspired alternatives