Briefing Description
Quantum technology is moving from laboratories into industrial and defence applications. Governments worldwide are committing billions in public investment, tightening export controls, and drafting regulatory frameworks. Legislators and regulators must make decisions about funding allocation, export control scope, cryptographic migration mandates, and research policy. These decisions have significant consequences: under-regulation risks national security exposure; over-regulation risks driving talent and investment to competitors. Getting the balance right requires understanding what quantum technology can and cannot do, what the realistic timelines are, and what policy instruments have evidence behind them.
This briefing is designed for non-technical policymakers. It avoids jargon, uses policy-relevant framing throughout, and focuses on the decisions legislators and regulators actually face. The session covers the geopolitical dynamics of quantum competition with specific investment figures, the national security implications of cryptographic vulnerability, the range of policy instruments available with evidence on their effectiveness, and the trade-offs inherent in different regulatory approaches. All content is calibrated to the current state of the technology, not speculative future capabilities.
What participants cover
- Quantum technology landscape: computing, communications, and sensing explained for non-technical policymakers with realistic capability timelines
- Geopolitical competition: national investment comparison (US, China, EU, UK), technology denial strategies, and allied cooperation frameworks
- National security implications: cryptographic vulnerability, harvest-now-decrypt-later threat to government communications, and critical infrastructure exposure
- Policy instruments: cryptographic migration mandates (binding versus guidance), research funding models (mission-driven versus curiosity-driven), and talent policy trade-offs
- Regulatory approaches compared: US NSM-10, UK NCSC guidance, EU NIS2 and Cybersecurity Act, with evidence on compliance outcomes
- Common policy mistakes: over-investing in quantum computing at the expense of quantum security, confusing quantum communications with unbreakable encryption, and the vendor hype cycle