Workshop Description
Legislators and regulators are being asked to make decisions about quantum technology with incomplete information and under significant vendor and geopolitical pressure. Should PQC migration be mandated with penalties, or encouraged through guidance? Should QKD networks receive public investment, or does PQC make them unnecessary for most use cases? Should quantum computing export controls be broadened, or do they risk pushing allied research offshore? The NCSC has publicly stated that QKD does not provide the security guarantees often claimed; how should regulators interpret this when quantum communications companies lobby for public infrastructure investment?
This workshop provides the technical literacy needed to evaluate these competing claims without becoming a technical specialist. It covers quantum computing, communications, and sensing in policy-relevant terms: what each can do now, what the realistic development timeline is, where the genuine regulatory gaps exist, and what proportionate regulation looks like. The session draws on case studies from other technology domains (internet governance, biotechnology, nuclear energy) to illustrate what happens when regulation is too early, too late, or too broad. All content is calibrated to current capability, not speculative futures.
What participants cover
- Quantum computing: current NISQ capability (50-1,000+ qubits, high error rates), fault-tolerant timeline estimates (2030-2040), and what regulators should conclude from vendor roadmaps
- Quantum communications: what QKD provides versus what is claimed, the NCSC position, and regulatory implications for national communications infrastructure
- Quantum sensing: dual-use concerns for atomic clocks, gravimeters, and magnetometers in navigation, defence, and medical applications
- Proportionate regulation design: sector-specific versus horizontal approaches, standards-based regulation, and mandatory sunset and review clauses
- Common policy mistakes: confusing QKD with unbreakable encryption, premature regulation of speculative capabilities, hardware over-investment at the expense of security
- Vendor claim evaluation: a structured methodology for separating genuine quantum capability from marketing