Workshop Description
Digital archives with 50-100 year retention obligations face a unique quantum risk. The cryptographic signatures and timestamps that guarantee the integrity and provenance of archived content today rely on RSA and ECDSA. A cryptographically relevant quantum computer would allow an attacker to forge signatures retroactively, undermining the evidentiary value of entire collections. For broadcast archives, film preservation vaults, news agencies, and public sector cultural heritage institutions, this is not a future problem. Content archived today under classical signatures will be vulnerable within its intended retention period.
This workshop examines the specific cryptographic dependencies in digital preservation infrastructure: signature schemes used in Archival Information Packages (AIPs), cryptographic timestamping services, fixity checking mechanisms, and Submission/Dissemination Information Package integrity. We assess the NIST post-quantum signature standards (FIPS 204 ML-DSA, FIPS 205 SLH-DSA) and the stateful hash-based schemes (XMSS per RFC 8391, LMS per RFC 8554) for their suitability in long-term archival contexts. The OAIS reference model (ISO 14721) and PREMIS metadata framework provide the structural context. Participants leave with a migration plan for re-signing existing archives and implementing PQC-native integrity for new ingest workflows.
What participants cover
- Hash-based signature schemes for archival integrity: XMSS (RFC 8391), LMS (RFC 8554), and SLH-DSA (FIPS 205) selection criteria for 50-100 year retention horizons
- Cryptographic timestamping under PQC: migrating RFC 3161 timestamp authority infrastructure and re-stamping existing timestamp chains
- OAIS reference model (ISO 14721) integration: mapping PQC signatures to AIP structure, fixity metadata, and Preservation Description Information
- PREMIS metadata framework: recording cryptographic algorithm changes, re-signing events, and signature validity periods in preservation metadata
- Re-signing strategy for existing archives: batch re-signing versus hash tree approaches for collections with millions of archived objects
- Regulatory and standards landscape: ETSI TS 119 312 (cryptographic suites for electronic signatures), EU eIDAS trust services, and UK National Archives digital preservation requirements